I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.

The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it denos't mtater in waht oredr the ltetres in a wrod are, the olny iprnoatmt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae.

The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed
it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!


An obírnn sé seo le Galeage maes tú?

E (4690)

Bí citnne go n-obiírnon sé le Gaiegle. Obiírnon sé le tegana ar btih!

This research has beeen abused so many times! No, it doesn't work in every language. The words' average length has to be below certain threshhold for this to work. So say - such technique is useless in the case of Finnish or Hungarian. I don't remember, but average English word is about 5-6 characters long. So then you have between 30-40% of characters in the right place (those first and last letter). Whenever average length of word is increasing recognition weakens and for some languages this reading becomes impossible!

Yes, tihs is a calssic. And I wnoedr if tehre eevr was any reserach bhenid it at all.

I was ocne broed at wrok and worte a porrgam taht tkaes a peice of txet and randmoly mxies up the lteetrs isndie ecah wrod taht has mroe tahn trhee lteetrs in it, laeivng the frist and the lsat lteetr unchagned. Not too oriignal, but hree it is:

http://mbm.dotnet11.hostbasket.com/obfuscator/

(Aapprnetly the pgae olny wroks in Intenret Explroer. I hvaen't had a cahcne to fix taht yet. Hvaen't been mcuh broed at wrok ltaley!)

Qtoue "Aapprnetly the pgae olny wroks in Intenret Explroer"

It wokrs in Frifeox...

go riabh miath aagt

Who got that?

Tuihg msie é.

Ach níl ann ach saóefid