Author |
Message |
Robert Unregistered guest Posted From:
| Posted on Monday, August 01, 2005 - 06:42 am: |
|
Hi, I was wondering why the double 'mm' was used in older spelling such as in 'cumman'. M is tensed anyway, so there would seem no need for m and mm seperately (unlike rr, ll, nn) Or was there once a difference felt? |
|
Lughaidh
Member Username: Lughaidh
Post Number: 546 Registered: 01-2005
| Posted on Monday, August 01, 2005 - 09:30 am: |
|
Do you mean, in Old or Middle Irish? I don't think was used in Classical Irish or later. In Old and Middle Irish, was used because most of the time, "m" standing alone was pronounced as a nasal v (written mh inniu). So we have Old/Middle Irish mm > Modern m Old/middle Irish m > Modern mh |
|
|