| Author |
Message |
    
Aonghus
Member
Username: Aonghus
Post Number: 10001
Registered: 08-2004
| | Posted on Tuesday, July 06, 2010 - 12:15 pm: |   
|
10001 Táim anseo ró mhinic  |
|
Tuigim
Member
Username: Tuigim
Post Number: 9
Registered: 06-2010
| | Posted on Tuesday, July 06, 2010 - 05:43 pm: |
|
Is maith an rud é go bhfuil tú anseo go minic.
An bhfuil focail mar sin i nGaeilge?
Ara, dá mbeadh aon aga agam air, dhéanfainn liosta. |
|
Curiousfinn
Member
Username: Curiousfinn
Post Number: 418
Registered: 08-2008
| | Posted on Tuesday, July 06, 2010 - 06:21 pm: |
|
ramhar
m'anam
mar shampla. Bhí mé ag iarradh an cheanna ceist timpeall is bliain ó shin. Bhí me tríocha trí bhliana d'aois.
Nó "caca milis". B)
(Message edited by curiousfinn on July 06, 2010)
Tine, siúil liom!
|
|
Aonghus
Member
Username: Aonghus
Post Number: 10003
Registered: 08-2004
| | Posted on Tuesday, July 06, 2010 - 06:27 pm: |
|
Cáca a bheadh ceart a FhF. (Bheadh caca míbhlasta).
aga [ainmfhocal firinscneach den cheathrú díochlaonadh]
seal ama, tréimhse, achar.
ala [ainmfhocal ]
ar ala na huaire ((in abairt) de phreab, ar an toirt).
Táim cinte go bhfuil tuilleadh ann, ach ní ritheann siad liom anois. |
|
Taidhgín
Member
Username: Taidhgín
Post Number: 872
Registered: 07-2006
| | Posted on Tuesday, July 06, 2010 - 11:29 pm: |
|
In the old spelling when "d séimhithe" or "d buailte" appeared as a d with a dot over it the word "dhiaidh" in a phrase such as "i mo dhiaidh" was a palindrome. (spelling?). |
|
An_chilleasrach
Member
Username: An_chilleasrach
Post Number: 291
Registered: 01-2009
| | Posted on Wednesday, July 07, 2010 - 05:14 am: |
|
To qualify as a palindrome, it would have to be spelled "diaid" - am I right in saying that only the first "dh" would be represented as a "d buailte" and that the second one, even in the old spelling, would be written "dh"?
Not to rain on the palindromic parade but just to improve my understanding of the seanchló. |
|
Aonghus
Member
Username: Aonghus
Post Number: 10004
Registered: 08-2004
| | Posted on Wednesday, July 07, 2010 - 07:08 am: |
|
quote:am I right in saying that only the first "dh" would be represented as a "d buailte" and that the second one, even in the old spelling, would be written "dh"? Níl. Ní fheictear "h" san tseanchló ach amháin mar úrú, nó ag tús focail. |
|
Taidhgín
Member
Username: Taidhgín
Post Number: 873
Registered: 07-2006
| | Posted on Wednesday, July 07, 2010 - 11:39 am: |
|
An chilleasrach: No. Both ds had a séimhiú (dot)over them.
The seanchló was abandoned because of the spread of Irish into businesses requiring typing and printing. Offices would have had to buy two machines etc. Sadly now when it is too late that would not create a problem. We could easily use one of the new versions of the old script. "Sigh! / Osna!" I am not recommending it however. |
|
Aonghus
Member
Username: Aonghus
Post Number: 10006
Registered: 08-2004
| | Posted on Wednesday, July 07, 2010 - 11:53 am: |
|
|
|
An_chilleasrach
Member
Username: An_chilleasrach
Post Number: 292
Registered: 01-2009
| | Posted on Wednesday, July 07, 2010 - 12:51 pm: |
|
Maith agaibh. Bhí rud eigin cloiste agam maidir leis an "h" agus an tseanchló agus cheap mé go bhfeictear é anseo is ansiud. Cuimhneoidh mé amach anseo go dtagann sé as bhfolach amháin mar úrú agus mar thúslitir. |
|
Taidhgín
Member
Username: Taidhgín
Post Number: 874
Registered: 07-2006
| | Posted on Thursday, July 08, 2010 - 12:42 pm: |
|
Ba bhreá liom gaelchló a úsáid, a Aonghuis, agus molaim lucht a thionscanta. Is dóigh liom go mbeadh sé go hálainn sa chomharthaíocht phoiblí. Bheadh faitíos orm áfach go mbeadh sé ina bhac ar fhoghlaimeoirí laga agus is orthusan a bheidh an teanga bheo ag brath amach anseo. |
|
Aonghus
Member
Username: Aonghus
Post Number: 10012
Registered: 08-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, July 08, 2010 - 03:54 pm: |
|
Ba cheart é úsáid ceart go leor. Tá comharthaí sráide i roinnt bailte ag baint feidhm as (arís).
Ach d'fhéadfaí i bhfad níos mó feidhm a bhaint as. |
|
