Author |
Message |
Antaine
| Posted on Thursday, February 05, 2004 - 10:49 am: |
|
I'm wondering if "behind" (thiar) follows the same pattern as the other prepositions. I mean, "before" (riomh) is there, and "over" (thar) is almost the same word...could thiar be construted thusly? thiar: thiaram thiarat thiaris thiaristi thiarainn thiaraibh thiarstu it seems to me like a no-brainer, but I cannot find "behind" on any list of prepositional pronouns. is there some reason "before" should be a prepositional pronoun, but "behind" not? |
|
Aonghus
| Posted on Thursday, February 05, 2004 - 12:09 pm: |
|
Thiar is an adverb, not a preposition. Behind me: taobh thiar díom |
|
Antaine
| Posted on Thursday, February 05, 2004 - 01:12 pm: |
|
go raibh maith agat (all i had was the single word added under the list of prepositions from an old class)... however, if "before" is a preposition, what is its equivalent opposite, "behind" or "after"? |
|
Celtoid
| Posted on Thursday, February 05, 2004 - 06:13 pm: |
|
roimh - before. tar éis, i ndiaidh - after. |
|
Aonghus
| Posted on Friday, February 06, 2004 - 04:25 am: |
|
I think there is no preposition which is exactly equivalent to "behind" or "after". The phrase will very depending on the exact context. |
|
|