Author |
Message |
Sean Kelley ()
| Posted on Sunday, July 21, 2002 - 10:20 pm: |
|
I've finally got around to reading Angela Bourke's book "The Burning of Bridget Cleary". I had the pleasure of sitting in on a lecture of hers at Harvard over ten years ago. It is a remarkable book; so much so that I had to read it quickly as my wife was eager to read it too. It covers the fate of Bridget Cleary in rural Tiperary in 1895. But more importantly it describes the two different "views" of the incident. Part of her argument is that the belief in seanchas and the old system of using the supernatural to explain events and physical conditions is a way to smooth the unexplicable and maintain cohesiveness in a closed rural society. The "modern" Ireland and the codefication of a system of laws requires an individual to act regardless of the group/community. As the rules of society are codified so it is expected of the individual to be aware of them and to so act as to prevent their violation. The court was incredulous that the other eight or so accused besides Michael Cleary did not act to save her. I get the impression that a part of what Angela is trying to say is that within the "old" mentality, they fell back on using their "seanchas" or "fairy" stories to mask over the clear homicide and spousal abuse. For a small community to survive, confrontation would ultimately be more destructive. So this liquid sort of "old" view would permit this type of occurrence and attempt to smooth them over with attribution to changelings/fairy abduction because the needs of the many outway the needs of the one. I hope I'm making sense in what I am saying it is hard for me to describe. I look forward to other opinions. Sean |
|
Doreen Ford Bruscell ()
| Posted on Thursday, August 15, 2002 - 04:35 pm: |
|
A Chara: Sorry it took so long to respond.(I expected to return here and find an on-going discussion!) What seems important is that those involved, from the outset, were treated as a group and not as individuals who made independent decisions. The author points out that any one of these people could have been placed on a scale and fall anywhere from total belief to almost total disbelief in fairies. Yet, in order for a political point to be made by those in opposition to Home Rule, i.e., 'the Irish are incapable of governing themselves', this was necessary. What is not really touched on (unless I missed it, in which case I apologize to the author) is the loss of language. The so-called "Fairy Faith" had its growth within the Irish Language. I don't think one can fully understand any culture without an understanding of the language in which that culture flourished. There was another book published shortly after Angela Bourke's, which the SF Chronicle reviewed along with it. The title is "The Cooper's Wife is Missing", by Joan Hoff and Marian Yeates. I am about half way through it, so you may hear from me again when I'm done. Le Meas Dóirín |
|
|